Re: Re: [libdb-develop] Re: W "Forms" and the use of matching "Roles"
Status: Inactive
Brought to you by:
morbus
From: Richard A. <lil...@ya...> - 2004-07-25 21:35:26
|
> From: Bruce D'Arcus <bd...@fa...> > Subject: Re: [libdb-develop] Re: W "Forms" and the > use of matching "Roles" > http://www.austlit.edu.au/common/manual/ > AuthorityLists.html#WorkTypeTerms From http://www.austlit.edu.au/common/manual/AuthorityLists.html#WorkTypeTerms : > D.2 Work Types > A work type is essentially about number - is the > work a single thing? Or a collection of things? Or > intrinsically part of a thing? The Work Type > attribute is mandatory for all work records, and can > be chosen more than once. I'm not quite understanding you're implying here. IANAL (I Am Not A Librarian), just an end user, but this still seems redundant to me. Whether or not a work is a single thing, or a part of a thing (such as an issue of a serial/periodical) would be covered by a work's termination wouldn't it? From FRBR (http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.pdf): > 4.2.5 Intended Termination > Intended Termination of a work is a reflection of > whether the work has been conceived as having a > finite end or whether it is intended to continue > indefinitely. It seems to me that WorkTypeTerms would be best used in libdb_relationships_types. Here's an example. Tolkien's LOTR was conceived as a single work, but published as a trilogy. LOTR:TFOTR is an expression of LOTR. To map it out in LibDB: libdb_work: title: LOTR ...................................... libdb_expression: title: TFOTR ...................................... libdb_relationships: referer_table: libdb_work relationship_type_id: ABC referent_table: libdb_expression ...................................... libdb_relationships_types: id: ABC name: AuthorSeries subject: author series includes object: is a part of author series description: A collection of individual works that form a series by a single author. Usually conceived of as a series by the author, but can become a series after publication. John Marsden's 'Tomorrow Series' (http://www.austlit.edu.au/run?ex=ShowWork&workId=CoN)) is an example of author definition, while Martin Boyd's 'The Langton Quartet' (http://www.austlit.edu.au/run?ex=ShowWork&workId=C6dO) was defined as a series after all four works were published. ...................................................... I think this is a handy compromise from casual end user to librarian and/or cataloger. Any thoughts? _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now. http://messenger.yahoo.com |