Re: [libdb-develop] "chapters"

[Bruce D'A. <bd...@fa...>]

On Feb 9, 2004, at 5:10 PM, Morbus Iff wrote:

> And, thinking further ahead with my desire for serials (which I'll
> be doing after movies), I can see "Chapters" not being an appropriate
> denomination for a magazine. So, should there be one communal term
> with possibly confusing, or improper characteristics (ala "Chapters"
> or "Contents", thinking of movies + books) or should things be broken
> down into different types of annotations? "Movie Chapters",
> "Contents (Physical)", and "Contents (???)"?

What's the purpose of this structure?  Is it just to register the, um, 
contents of some thing?  So, I pull up a book record and this field 
displays the table of contents?  The same with a DVD?

MODS actually has a tableOfContents element, though I never use it...

Bruce