Re: [libdb-develop] "chapters"

[Morbus I. <mo...@di...>]

 >Was just looking through the schema.  I wonder if "chapters" in the
 >annotation table ought to be named something different.  "Contents"?

Is "contents" still representative of a DVD? Is "Contents" literal,
or figurative? The "contents" of THE WICKER MAN box set includes
some little trinket thing I can't remember. Likewise, the "Contents"
of the DVD could be "13 trailers; 2 Behind-the-scenes, 3 featurettes".
At least in the realm of a DVD "chapter", that's not what I meant. [1]
FRBR kinda confuses this issue, though, with the approach that
each extra "thing" of a manifestation should be considered a
different work. So, a DVD's "behind-the-scenes" is considered
a new work, related to the original movie work. An English book,
with a syllabus, are considered two separate related works.

[1] Though, technically, those bits of contents are in fact stored
on a chapter of a DVD, the chapters I was referred to here was
the movie chapters, often shown on an inset card.


-- 
Morbus Iff ( i put the demon back in codemonkey )
Culture: http://www.disobey.com/ and http://www.gamegrene.com/
Spidering Hacks: http://amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0596005776/disobeycom
icq: 2927491 / aim: akaMorbus / yahoo: morbus_iff / jabber.org: morbus