Re: [libcoap-developers] current state of TLS implementations

[Jean-Claude M. <Jea...@sp...>]

Hello Carsten,

I have implemented support for TLS and DTLS with OpenSSL (and only PSK). AFAIK no one is working on a GnuTLS alternative right now.
I don’t think there is any reason to build with tinydtls on desktop linux, other than testing, since it removes support for TLS, so as of today there is no conflict.
Is your question about distributing prebuilt packages ?

Best regards,
Jean-Claude.

On 4 Nov 2017, at 20:15, Carsten Schoenert <c.s...@t-...<mailto:c.s...@t-...>> wrote:

Hi,

I have some kind lost the overview of the various states for
implementing TLS by using OpenSSL and GnuTLS libraries. Can someone
please give an update on this? And we should document the current state
in on of the GNU files (README, Changelog, TODO, ...) and probably also
do an update of the project website.

Is there some commitment what to do the libcoap itself due the
independent usage of OpenSSL, GnuTLS and TinyTLS?
I mean, do we need to build later various libcoap versions depending on
the used SSL library? If so we need to thing about some things for
installing the library by the autotools I guess. At least the pkgfile
will result in having different content.

--
Regards
Carsten Schoenert

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org<http://Slashdot.org>! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
libcoap-developers mailing list
lib...@li...<mailto:lib...@li...>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libcoap-developers