Re: [Libclc-developers] Re: clc_ultostr doc change

[regis <re...@in...>]

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> 
> >> so that is a vote for ultostr?
> >
> >Mhh Yes,
> >except that the mangled  names of all the string functions suck.
> 
> tell us a better name for uh ultostr()...
> strfromul?

clc_string_from_unsigned_long()

-- 
Regis