Re: [Libclc-developers] Re: clc_ultostr doc change

[Hallvard B F. <h.b...@us...>]

regis writes:
>> so that is a vote for ultostr?
> 
> Mhh Yes, 
> except that the mangled  names of all the string functions suck.

Say it on c.l.c.  With suggestions for other names.  Then I'll probably
speak up against you, I think most names are fine:-)

-- 
Hallvard