Re: [Libclc-developers] Source file names
Status: Planning
Brought to you by:
augestad
|
From: <bo...@me...> - 2003-03-26 16:58:09
|
Hallvard B Furuseth wrote: > Bjørn Augestad writes: > >>Hallvard B Furuseth wrote: >> >>>I think we should drop the 'clc_' prefix from the .c filenames and maybe >>>the internal .h files (the ones that are not installed) in the future. >> >>What do we gain? > > > Sorry, that was a rather truncated message. > What I meant to say was, there are filesystems with uncomfortable > limits for filenames, like 8.3 characters or max 14 characters. > So we should try to keep filenames short. Does anyone on the list even know of a C developer working on platform with a 8.3 filesystem only? I don't... We cannot make everyone happy, and I'm not going to have lousy filenames for 99% of us to support 1% working on archaic or very special platforms. They won't use libclc anyway. -- boa libclc home: http://libclc.sourceforge.net |