Re: [Libclc-developers] Source file names

[<bo...@me...>]

Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
> I think we should drop the 'clc_' prefix from the .c filenames and maybe
> the internal .h files (the ones that are not installed) in the future.
> 

What do we gain?

If a standalone function is named clc_foo, I hope to see
	clc_foo.c
	clc_foo.man
	clc_foo.html
	clc_foo.o
	...

For e.g. clc_strdup, we may get problems since we implement a function 
which frequently already exists. So a man page must be named 
clc_strdup.man (or whatever extension is proper).

We can of course have clc_strdup.man even if we have strdup.c, but that 
makes it harder to script things.

Just my 0.02 NOK.

-- 
boa

libclc home: http://libclc.sourceforge.net