Re: Fwd: Re: [Libclc-developers] Introducing the double linked list interface

[Bryan D. <bd...@bd...>]

=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 18 March 2003 05:38 pm, Bj=F8rn Augestad wrote:
> Bryan Donlan wrote:
> > [ Another misdirected message ]
>
> So I'm not the only one hitting reply instead of reply all... ;-)
>
> > ----------  Forwarded Message  ----------
> >
> > To: Bryan Donlan <bd...@bd...>
> > Cc: lib...@li...
> > Subject: Re: [Libclc-developers] Introducing the double linked list
> >  interface
> >
> > On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 19:37:01 -0500
> >
> > Bryan Donlan <bd...@bd...> wrote:
> >>>typedef struct CLC_DL_NODE
> >>
> >>I don't think struct of typedef names should be uppercase. IMO, only
> >> enums and #defines should be uppercase.
> >
> > I second that. It appears we need a style document or a consistent
> > codebase to model the code after.
>
> You're right.
>
> My initial hope was that the code in the clc_bitset thread would be a
> template for further adt's. Wrong again...
>
> As for consistent codebase, I'm currently working as hard as I can to
> create a workable example of a framework for containers. I've got the
> list and the iterator working now (2 minutes ago), and hope to get
> another container adt working just to see that the iterator fits more
> than just list.

What about maps/dictionaries/whatever they're called? It should have a hash=
ing=20
function on the items...

> It's influenced by the code found at Michael B. Allens and Thomas
> Stegens home pages, as well as some weird code I found on this server ;-)
>
>     http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/table_of_contents.html
>
> We really need to get a consistent way of handling containers and
> iterators. It's my fault that we haven't had such a discussion prior to
> this thread. I'm sorry and am currently trying hard to make up for it by
> presenting a coherent approach asap. I'll need a couple of days more,
> though.
>
> The current version is available in cvs if anyone wants to peek. No doc
> and not a lot of comments yet, though. :-)
>
> [snip]
>
> PS: I just received a really lame email virus addressed to a lot of us
> from someone down under. Time to run virus check, anyone?

No worries, mate, I use Linux! :)
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+d6DPx533NjVSos4RAgRLAKDGhpIk7xqXuKvXpc+ipJQfAHgWjQCcC5bQ
yqLdTwXTqQYTgrcz2niSQzY=3D
=3Dieow
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----