Re: [Libbt-devel] question about btlist

[Peter S. <stu...@cd...>]

(Again, please everyone, check out the list-reply function in your
mailers, it's a great help to limit unneccessary traffic.

--8<-- http://docs.kde.org/en/3.3/kdepim/kmail/menus.html
Message->Reply to Mailing-List... (L)

    Opens up the composer window, inserts the quoted text of the
currently selected message and presets the To: field with the
mailing-list address. If you didn't specify a mailing-list address
for the currently selected folder and KMail can't determine the
posting address from the currently selected message then the To:
field will be empty. Your identity will automatically be set to the
one which this message was sent to.
-->8--

In mutt, there's a list-reply command that I've bound to l in my
setup, and changed limit to L:

--8<-- .muttrc
bind index l list-reply
bind index L limit
bind pager l list-reply
-->8--

)

On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 04:38:36PM +0100, Alien wrote:
> > --8<--
> > 'pieces' maps to a string whose length is a multiple of 20. It is to
> > be subdivided into strings of length 20, each of which is the sha1
> > hash of the piece at the corresponding index.
> > -->8--
> >
> > So yes, it's supposed to be long and binary.
> 
> i'm just saying that we could let btlist (or btcheck, i forgot) show
> it as hexadecimal.

Oh, ok! Sure, that could be done, but since the pieces are abstracted
away inside libbt there's limited use for the hashes..


//Peter