From: <J.B...@ew...> - 2007-11-21 19:32:44
|
Perhaps superfluous but still: *we can use 2geom inside Inkscape already = without problem!!!* Ted Gould wrote: >=20 > On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 20:23 -0500, MenTaLguY wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 15:50 -0800, Ted Gould wrote: > > > Now that we're including a large part of lib2geom for LPE anyway;=20 > > > what else can we use it for? I'm unsure of the status of=20 > the whole library. > > > One feature that I hear alot about when talking to people is the=20 > > > inset/outset function in Inkscape being "less than perfect." I=20 > > > think this was on the TODO for lib2geom, is it done? > >=20 > > The pieces are there, although I think it'll take setting=20 > up Inkscape=20 > > to use it to find any remaining gaps in functionality. >=20 > So I guess what we need is a lib2geom release so that we can=20 > get it packaged and linked to correctly? Then we can start=20 > to see where that breaks? I don't think we want a release now, so we can quickly address issues = that surface. I think it is best to keep 2geom inside Inkscape code for = 0.46, and have a good and nice 2geom release for 0.47. This way we can = profit from bleeding edge 2geom which atm is nicer than a release will = be imho. I am fine by copying 2geom code to Inkscape for now :-) (note that early on in LPE development i did have 2geom linked in as = separate lib, 'release like'. It is not too much of a change) On our wiki, we have started a help page where people can ask questions = and put answers. Hopefully this will grow to a somewhat complete 2geom = guide. http://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php/WorkingWith2GeomFAQ Ciao, Johan |