From: Alexander B. <ale...@lu...> - 2016-12-04 23:08:10
|
On 12/01/2016 11:12 AM, Nathan Hurst wrote: > If we can just constrain the code licence to match the 2geom one, I > think everything is fine, otherwise I guess we could include separate > licencing for just this piece of code. The file jet.h itself contains the license: // Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without // modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: // // * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, // this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. // * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, // this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation // and/or other materials provided with the distribution. // * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its contributors may be // used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without // specific prior written permission. I think it's fine to just include the modified file in lib2geom. > I'm happy to do a code review if you remind me in a few weeks. Thank you, I will. Best Regards, Alexander |