Re: [Lib2geom-devel] Mandatory path stitching

[Krzysztof K. <twe...@gm...>]

2015-03-27 21:00 GMT+01:00 Nathan Hurst <nj...@nj...>:
> I'm ok with this idea (indeed I thought it was already true).  It is
> useful (as you know) to have the ability to represent a collection of
> segments for some algorithms.  But I think that would be better
> modelled as a colleciton of Path (e.g. PathVector).

boost::ptr_vector<Curve>, the underlying container of Path, would be
adequate for representing arbitrary collections of segments.

Regards, Krzysztof