Re: [Lib2geom-devel] Templates

[Krzysztof K. <twe...@gm...>]

2014-06-24 11:44 GMT+02:00  <jbc...@sw...>:
> I asked myself the question: should 2geom be in the standard library? Surely, many applications would benefit from a standard geometry library. Then I thought, it is not nearly as general as it could be.

I am somewhat skeptical of pursuing generality as a design goal in
itself, beyond the needs of Inkscape and other drawing-centric
programs. CGAL is a lot more general than 2Geom, but it's also a pain
to use.

Regards, Krzysztof