From: mathog <ma...@ca...> - 2013-11-06 17:23:39
|
On 06-Nov-2013 08:39, Nathan Hurst wrote: > But that code has been used for a decade now with no evidence of > problems, I would be loath to change it purely for stylistic reasons. AKA "if it ain't broken, don't fix it". It is almost always true that that there is some new language feature not used in code that has been around for a while. (For any type of program, and any language.) In general it is simply a waste of effort modifying existing code to use new language features if doing so will not immediately improve the performance or stability of the code. Neither of which seems to be the case here. Think about it, you can put a lot of work into rewriting 2geom, and when all is said and done, everything calling it will get exactly the same results at the same speed as they do now. So why bother? Regards, David Mathog ma...@ca... Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech |