From: Nathan H. <nj...@nj...> - 2013-08-14 14:19:04
|
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 09:23:14PM -0300, Vin?cius dos Santos Oliveira wrote: > Em Ter, 2013-08-13 ??s 23:13 +1000, Nathan Hurst escreveu: > > > I think you should be able to write something using direct string > > concatenation in an afternoon. > > > I already started coding, but I want to share design ideas sooner. > > There will be a function, called render_svg_path (declared under > svg-path-render.h file), analogous to parse_svg_path. This function will > receive an ostream object and a PathVector. I still didn't reasoned > enough to conclude if this should be an operator overload or a normal > function, but I think it should be a normal function to maintain > consistency. This all sounds great. > parse_svg_path only treats the "d" attribute, so should render_svg_path This sentence is correct (if you add the . at the end :) > (this english sentence I don't know if it's correct, I'm trying to use > the same grammar technique from Donnie Darko movie: > <https://gist.github.com/vinipsmaker/6226845#file-donnie-darko-part-L11>). This sentence is incorrect (or at least a non-typical construction): normally you would put the subject at the front of the sentence. "I don't know if this sentence is correct, I'm..." > My tests ran fine and I don't think I'll have much trouble, but lib2geom > needs some love as a "standalone" installed library. Yes, it really needs a new, passionate, maintainer with the right personality and skills to refine it into the elegant and widely used library it should be. > When I tried to > compile-and-link my tests to a system-installed-dynamic-lib 2geom, there > where some include files errors due to missing installed files (numeric > folder). I fixed this error locally, but I'll share the results soon. njh |