From: Shriramana S. <sa...@gm...> - 2012-09-05 02:25:30
|
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Krzysztof Kosiński <twe...@gm...> wrote: > 2012/9/4 Shriramana Sharma <sa...@gm...>: >> My program is going to be GPL. I suppose that's OK? Is there some GPL >> 2 vs GPL 3 problem involved? > > Most of livarot is actually public domain. The license situation of > Inkscape is not completely clear, as currently it seems to contain > both GPLv2-only and GPLv3-only code, but most of the files are GPLv2. Ouch! When the GPL v2-3 transition happened, the KDE people had a drive to convert everything to a uniform licence with people hunting up old contributors to get them to reassign their contributions to the new licence with the "or at your option any later version" clause. Perhaps that should be done here. > Yes, the unfilled parts will be included. as counterdirectional > subpaths. 'Break apart' is equivalent to creating one Geom::PathVector > per Geom::Path. (Note that in SVG terminology, Geom::PathVector > corresponds to a path and Geom::Path to a subpath.) Nice. I have some more questions but I'll tkae them to inkscape-devel since this list is for lib2geom. -- Shriramana Sharma |