From: mathog <ma...@ca...> - 2012-09-04 15:48:04
|
Thanks for the reply. The option of having to use livarot, which "nobody understands" is not terribly appealing, and 2geom has its own issues, notably a broken boolean shape method. Is there some reason the inkscape project is creating 2geom instead of using CGAL? CGAL seems to do the same things and is in a more advanced state of development. For instance, here is the documentation for boolean operations: http://www.cgal.org/Manual/latest/doc_html/cgal_manual/Boolean_set_operations_2/Chapter_main.html CGAL can be used under a GPL license, so that isn't an issue. http://www.cgal.org/license.html Both 2geom and CGAL need boost, so there's no real difference in the dependencies. At this point I have not really used either, but from a cursory comparison of 2geom and CGAL it looks like the latter might be a better choice. Regards, David Mathog ma...@ca... Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech |