[LDAPsh-devel] RE: ldapsh development

[Rafael C. <Raf...@li...>]

Great for me.

Peder, since your patches are in production since a long time ago, I
think you can commit staight to HEAD.
I will get the new HEAD at end of june, when I'll work again on it.

Thanks a lot for all your contributions.

Rafael

-----Original Message-----
From: Peder O. Klingenberg [mailto:po...@li...]=20
Sent: mardi, 27. mai 2003 12:16
To: Rafael Corvalan; James Devenish; lda...@li...
Subject: Re: ldapsh development


"Rafael Corvalan" <Raf...@li...> writes:

> I propose giving you and Peder the rights to update CVS. At the end of

> June, I will contribute with patches I have on my site since near 1=20
> year...
>=20
> Let me know if that's OK for you.
> Peder, also for you?

Sure.  I think I already have commit-rights, due to the ssh access to
CVS, I just promised not to use it.  I take this as a go-ahead to start
committing.

The patches I posted to sourceforge have been in production since they
were posted.  They seem stable, and ldapsh is now the main user
administration tool at a customer site.

James, have you looked at those patches?  Are they ok with you?  Any
objections to committing those, from either of you?

Also, James, what are the patches you have?  Do you mind posting them to
sf so I can have a look?

Rafael, how do you prefer we do the commits?  Should we commit straight
to HEAD, or should we branch out?

(I've added ldapsh-devel to the to-list.  I like the archives on sf, and
it helps me sort my mail.)
--=20
Peder O. Klingenberg   |   Systemkonsulent/Systems Consultant
Linpro AS              |   URL: http://www.linpro.no/
Wdm. Thranes Gt 98b    |   Tlf: +47 22 87 11 80
NO-0175 OSLO           |   Fax: +47 22 87 11 81