Re: [Ldapdns-users] homeless entries (2.06)

[Mrs. B. <mrs...@ni...>]

On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 22:19 -0400, Alejandro Mery wrote:
> > Don't put associatedDomains for them then.
> > 
> > Is there a particular reason you need the BIND-think of zones?
> 
> i just needed a name for the things that have a SOA :)
> 
> if i don't use associatedDomains how do i set the name?

you use associatedDomains to the SOA. immediate children don't need it.
if you skip a level, LDAPDNS can't search everywhere.

> i have entries which belong to "the thing that have a SOA" below it, and 
> on a totally different branch of the directory. (see the ldif on my 
> first mail)
> 
> ou=Machines,dc=foo,dc=cl has lot of machines (dc=$machine) which names 
> are $machine.foo.0
> 
> foo.0 "thing that needs a SOA" is definied on 
> dc=Internal,ou=Services,dc=foo,dc=cl, with a nSRecord and a mXRecord.
> 
> and below dc=Interntal,ou=Services,dc=foo,dc=cl there are lot of 
> services (dc=$service) which names are $service.foo.0
> 
> i'm highly confused
> 
> Thanks,
> Alejandro Mery
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc:
> A global provider of Threat Management Solutions.
> Download our HomeAdmin security software for free today!
> http://www.demarc.com/info/Sentarus/hamr30
> _______________________________________________
> Ldapdns-users mailing list
> Lda...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ldapdns-users