From: Mrs. B. <mrs...@ni...> - 2004-11-07 03:53:38
|
On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 09:46 -0800, Gary Richardson wrote: > Hey, > > > > Ldapdns is essentially djbdns with some patches (last time I check..). You didn't check. LDAPDNS was initially written as using djb's dns library and much code form djbdns. LDAPDNS v2 doesn't share any djb code (sadly), and LDAPDNS v3 doesn't even share any openldap code. [[ and what the hell does this have to do with anything? ]] > The only thing you could do is run multiple instances – djbdns is > supposed to be fast, simple and secure so it doesn’t have anything > like views. Wha? BIND's views are much more complicated than DJBDNS or LDAPDNS's analog. Further, DJBDNS had the split-horizon concept first. |