Re: [Ldapdns-users] LDAPDNS schema and multiple associatedDomain attributes

[Mrs. B. <mrs...@ni...>]

The associatedDomain syntax modes aren't complete for LDAPDNS 2. For
LDAPDNS 3 they work exactly as you'd expect :)

For example :)

I have an LDIF that creates this:

dn: o=My Domain Root
o: My Domain Root
associatedDomain: nimh.org
associatedDomain: nimh.zorg
aRecord: 216.169.144.42
mXRecord: 10 nimh.org

And a env of:
CPU=`cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep processor | wc -l`
ROOT=~/src/testbed-ldapdns/root
SCHEMA=LDAPDNS
LISTEN=0:5300
HOSTMASTER=hos...@ni...
SELFNS=mydebugserver

And when I do either of:

$ dig @127.0.0.1 -p5300 -t any www.nimh.org
$ dig @127.0.0.1 -p5300 -t any www.nimh.zorg

I get exactly what I'd expect:

; <<>> DiG 9.2.2 <<>> @127.0.0.1 -p5300 -t any www.nimh.zorg
;; global options:  printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 63860
;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1
 
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;www.nimh.zorg.                 IN      ANY
 
;; ANSWER SECTION:
nimh.zorg.              86400   IN      SOA     mydebugserver.
hostmaster.nimh.org. 1062385562 10800 7200 604800 86400
www.nimh.zorg.          86400   IN      CNAME   nimh.org.
www.nimh.zorg.          86400   IN      A       216.169.144.42
www.nimh.zorg.          86400   IN      MX      10 nimh.org.
 
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
www.nimh.zorg.          86400   IN      NS      mydebugserver.
 
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
www.nimh.zorg.          86400   IN      A       216.169.144.42
 
;; Query time: 11 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#5300(127.0.0.1)
;; WHEN: Sun Aug 31 22:55:42 2003
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 175




On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 15:08, Andreas Brenk wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I just had a look at the LDAPDNS schema, as I plan to migrate from the
> old COSINE layout.
> 
> Everything runs fine as long as I just have one associatedDomain
> attribute per entry. When I add a second one ldapdns breaks. It just
> handles one of the specified domains. If I'm not mistaken it's the last
> one that is returned by the server.
> 
> Is it possible to fix this? I'd really like to have multiple
> associatedDomains per subtree. (Or am I doing something stupid here?)
> 
> Regards,
> Andreas
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Ldapdns-users mailing list
> Lda...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ldapdns-users