From: Michael R. <mi...@re...> - 2011-07-27 07:56:05
|
Hi Hans, in your email you wrote: > Note that I'm an active contributor to lm_sensors upstream too, > and a such I must say that it would be better if there would be > a plugin using libsensors rather then accessing sysfs directly. > The advantages are that libsensors takes care of the details > of sysfs parsing, and more importantly that it offers one > central configuration file for things like scaling and offsets > of sensors, as often some conversion is needed to go from raw > sysfs value to a "real" value. Using libsensors sounds like a good idea. The i2c_sensors plugin is quite old (it was contributed by Xavier Vello back in 2004). maybe at that time libsensors was not available, or in a bad quality, or... Another question comes to my mind: I always try to keep "embedded systems" in mind. Do you see a problem with libsensors there? OTOH, is there a possible performance penalty when using libsensors? anyway, because of me lacking experience with libsensors, and because of -ENOTIME, any volunteers for a new plugin? (I'd prefer having a seperate plugin for that, keeping the old one at least for some time) regards, Michael -- Michael Reinelt <mi...@re...> http://home.pages.at/reinelt GPG-Key 0xDF13BA50 ICQ #288386781 |