From: Michael R. <re...@eu...> - 2006-01-20 16:09:27
|
Hi Paul, Nice to hear from you again! > This question did trigger something that was on the back of mind for a > long time already. Is there a reason why you don't use C++ for > lcd4linux? That could simplify some of the problems addressed here. > Besides the structure you created in lcd4linux would map wonderfully to > an object architecture, and C++ would simplify many coding problems. There are two quite simple reasons: #1: I don't speak C++ #2: embedded systems, ucLinux et al may lack a C++ runtime environment > Second, what is the current status of the button support in lcd4linux? I > know it is planned for a long time already. But what are the problems > with it? Hey, you're asking the Forbidden Question :-) I'm currently finishing the GPO support (just one driver left), next will be 'virtual rows' (scrolling, should be quite simple), and after that I'm going to work on key support. The main problem is software design. I'm still not sure how keys should be handled best. But any ideas are very welcome! bye, Michael -- Michael Reinelt <re...@eu...> http://home.pages.at/reinelt GPG-Key 0xDF13BA50 ICQ #288386781 |