From: OB <ja...@ni...> - 2005-05-04 07:35:43
|
> > I think it would be a good idea to support both methods: busy-line > checking and a fixed delay. We've encountered situations in the past, > where waiting caused lcd4linux to eat up too much CPU cycles (especially > on slower systems). Funny ! It's precisely because of that reason I reverted to the fixed delay method : The busy-line checking was eating too much CPU.... But it might come from my crappy MediaGX-based test box. > Maybe you want to detect it by checking if there's a > "Wire.Busyline" entry in the config, and/or by using a config entry > "UseBusy" (as in the HD44780 driver). Ok, I'll do that on my next commit. (I've just commited the changes you asked me previously, and btw the driver now compile without warnings). Julien |