From: Michael R. <re...@eu...> - 2004-12-29 01:52:16
|
Hi there, >>On the other hand, SF CVS servers are not known to be reliable and I >>won't be bothered to switch to somethinkg else ... > > Hehe, you're right. But don't forget that Svn is pretty different from > CVS, and there will be some re-education to be done for all > developpers. You can read more and start learning using the Subversion > Book[2]. You are right, SVN is probably a lot better that CVS. I already thought about switching to SVN. But my/our primary goal is to get 0.10 out to the public. Changing source code management infrastructure at this point is Not The Right Thing (tm). Let's stay with SF CVS for the time being, let 0.10 become stable, and then switch to SVN. bye, Michael -- Michael Reinelt <re...@eu...> http://members.eunet.at/reinelt GPG-Key 0xDF13BA50 ICQ #288386781 |