From: Michael R. <re...@eu...> - 2004-05-22 19:02:09
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Xavier, | In fact, I didn't want to bother you, and there's a little detail I wanted | to speak with you : I think including it in a "doc" folder of the CVS tree | isn't a good choice, as there are API changes, and the doc won't be | up-to-date with both the release and CVS version. Hmmm... | So I'd like it to stay in a separate cvs module, and then just put the | compiled HTML files in the release tarballs. But in this case, | developpers would certainly forget to document their changes, as there | are two different "modules". Hmmm... | It's up to you to decide what to do. I knew you would say so :-) I must say that I've absolutely no idea how to decide. both ways have their pros an cons. anybody out there with experience in this area? Martin? | In fact, I think at least one RC is _mandatory_, to clean this freash | code, and get material to write the FAQ, the notes, ... Of course there will be at least one RC. I'm afraid there will be much more than RC's were meant to be... bye, Michael - -- Michael Reinelt Tel: +43 676 3079941 Geisslergasse 4 Fax: +43 316 692343 A-8045 Graz, Austria e-mail: re...@eu... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAr6OsiebFT98TulARAjVPAKCGF0WDY/pkUYRDcIQEQJcxznmXZwCgqr/Y y7NRfflkUsz2N+IH/JcdryE= =HQxc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |