Re: [Lcd4linux-devel] Re: Namespace

[Xavier V. <xav...@fr...>]

Hi Michael, hi Martin, hi list !

> Hrm... I'm afraid you won. I vote for :: too. Martin?
\o/

> Here's my plan: prepare the parser, rewrite all plugins so that ne 
> namespace is used, but DO NOT IMPLEMENT DYNAMIC LOADING!
> Why? I want to release 0.9.12 as soon as possible...
It's ok for me.

> a) how should the namespace look like when it contains only one 
> function? (or "contains itself")
> I guess this has already been answered:
> xmms()
> xmms::filename()
Yes. Another solution would be that plugin registers a parse() function
 acessible by xmms::parse(), and that if we call xmms(), the eval adds
 ::parse to function name.
Maybe it would be easier to implement, but do as you want.

> b) I think I'll modify the AddFunction call:
> AddFunction (<namespace> <function> <parameters> <real_function_ptr>)
> i.e.
> AddFunction ("xmms", NULL, 2, my_xmms)
> or
> AddFunction ("xmms", "filename", 2, my_xmms)
Okay.

Bye !
-- 
Xavier VELLO <xav...@fr...>

PS: what about the 'french connection' ? Sam are you here for
debiannisation ? 
PS #2: Luk: there's a problem with postinst script, it
fails. We should disable dialog, which is not worth debugging debconf.