From: Robert D. <ro...@he...> - 2006-09-28 20:38:21
|
Hi, Looking through the CVS repos on sf.net, I see that there are many many files that have been updated in the last few weeks, and last few months. I am curious why you are not including all of this stuff in the subversion repo in your trac pages? I work with svn on a daily basis and it would be a simple matter for me to tarball all of the current files (for anyone's benefit not just mine) if they were all in there. I am not as adept with CVS, indeed I don't even have an CVS client handy. Any plans to put your project in subversion? And how troublesome would it be for you to tarball the current working set for me to use? Thanks! On Sep 28, 2006, at 11:03 AM, Michael Reinelt wrote: > Hi Robert, > >> Thanks for the response Michael. As it turns out I think the pharm >> spam is gone now so you must have found it. At one point there was >> nothing at all in the trac pages except links I was not interested in >> following, offering free [insert drug here]. Thanks for cleaning >> that up. > > Ah, yes, I remember. The title page has been spammed yesterday... > >> lcd4linux_i2c.h:81: error: array type has incomplete element type > > This is a known bug, which is fixed in CVS. I'd recommend you to > use the > CVS version anyway, cause some 635 issues have been solved there IIRC. > >> I am still interested in working with someone on putting together a >> Fedora RPM for lcd4linux, so if anyone wants to collaborate on that >> please let me know. More shortly. > > I'm a debian user, so I can't be of much help here.... but there's a > SuSE RPM (don't know if Fedora and SuSE RPM's are compatible) Don't > know > if there are some "RPM sources" available in CVS.... > > > > bye, Michael > > > -- > Michael Reinelt <re...@eu...> > http://home.pages.at/reinelt > GPG-Key 0xDF13BA50 > ICQ #288386781 |