From: Michael R. <re...@eu...> - 2004-02-15 18:04:54
|
>>Should be no problem in hardware, but at the moment this is not >>supported in software. AND there's another problem: Some commands >>(clear, init, character define) go to _both_ displays at the same time, >>just by rising _both_ enable lines. > I'm very keen to do this for myself though. A 20x4 display is kinda small, > and I don't like the idea of loosing software controlled backlighting with a > 40x4 display. Is it complicated to change those commands to address each > display one at a time? Or maybe make it user configurable? > > I'm thinking all the commands that address both displays together are ones > used relatively infrequently? Consequently, addressing them one at a time > shouldn't have a noticable performance hit? Hmmm.... sneding data to both displays is used for icon definitions. This sequence is 9 bytes long, and can happen really often... But I don't see the problem: You can use 4 control lines from the parallel port (AUTOFD, INIT, SELECT and STROBE). The dual-HD44780 needs at least three (RS, SELECT#1, SELECT#2), because you can hardwire RW to GND. so you have a free line to control the latch individually... -- Michael Reinelt Tel: +43 676 3079941 Geisslergasse 4 Fax: +43 316 692343 A-8045 Graz, Austria e-mail: re...@eu... |