From: Aragon G. <ar...@ph...> - 2004-02-15 17:50:59
|
| By Michael Reinelt <re...@eu...> | [ 2004-02-15 19:31 +0200 ] > Should be no problem in hardware, but at the moment this is not > supported in software. AND there's another problem: Some commands > (clear, init, character define) go to _both_ displays at the same time, > just by rising _both_ enable lines. Ah ic. Yes, that will be a problem if this extra circuitry were added. You wouldn't want to send your init, clear, and character define to the CD4514s... ;) I'm very keen to do this for myself though. A 20x4 display is kinda small, and I don't like the idea of loosing software controlled backlighting with a 40x4 display. Is it complicated to change those commands to address each display one at a time? Or maybe make it user configurable? I'm thinking all the commands that address both displays together are ones used relatively infrequently? Consequently, addressing them one at a time shouldn't have a noticable performance hit? Thanks, Aragon |