Hi Xavier,
> The new plugin imon from nico does a very hazardous thing : it registers
> a version() function !! I'm sorry it can't be acceptable. With the next
> 'soing' redesing it can register imon::version (imon_version) but
> version() is not that clear.
Right, but how should he know? We didn't finish our discussion about the
namespace delimiter....
> PS to Michi : about ::
>
>>- there is no real 'object/method' system behind, so why try to mimic
>
> one?
> In Perl, for Objets, the syntax is object->method. The '::' delimiter
> expresses namespace::function or namespace::variable concept, exactly
> lcd4linux claim ;)
Hrm... I'm afraid you won. I vote for :: too. Martin?
I will try to rewrite the parser as soon as possible.
Here's my plan: prepare the parser, rewrite all plugins so that ne
namespace is used, but DO NOT IMPLEMENT DYNAMIC LOADING!
Why? I want to release 0.9.12 as soon as possible...
Two questions:
a) how should the namespace look like when it contains only one
function? (or "contains itself")
I guess this has already been answered:
xmms()
xmms::filename()
b) I think I'll modify the AddFunction call:
AddFunction (<namespace> <function> <parameters> <real_function_ptr>)
i.e.
AddFunction ("xmms", NULL, 2, my_xmms)
or
AddFunction ("xmms", "filename", 2, my_xmms)
Is this ok with you ?
bye, Michael
--
Michael Reinelt Tel: +43 676 3079941
Geisslergasse 4 Fax: +43 316 692343
A-8045 Graz, Austria e-mail: re...@eu...
|
