latexcalc-bugs Mailing List for latexcalc
Brought to you by:
bchurchill
Menu
▾
▴
latexcalc-bugs — Report bugs you encounter
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
|
From: Slim P. <sli...@gm...> - 2014-10-22 13:03:53
|
Hi Latexcalc.Sourceforge.Net Team,
Greetings for the day!
I hope you are well aware of the prospects of digital world. In this
competitive era, it's tough to maintain the quality of a website without
proper techniques.
We can help you with understanding the tricks and tweaks of Google
Analytics as well as the latest search engine guideline, to reach your
target audience quickly and easily.
Some of the important aspects that can enhance productivity and traffic
flow of your website are as follows:
1. Thorough web maintenance would prevent technical errors. This would
allow the search engine crawlers locate instantly and also index Webpages
properly.
2. Application of Google Analytics will allow usage of correct keywords
that would deliver instant website optimization.
3. Inclusion of quality and theme based links to the website, will
increase your link popularity.
4. Regular updates and promotions on social media networks to increase
brand awareness and brand value.
In lieu with our credentials and client testimonies, we promise to deliver
efficiently. This is just an introductory mail, portraying glimpses of
services we provide for our clients.
To make you understand your website's current health condition, we will be
glad to provide you a detailed analysis report in terms of WEBSITE AUDIT
REPORT for FREE.
Should you be interested, get in touch with us on the mentioned email
address or contact number.
Because we deliver to our clients with No CONTRACT and No SET UP FEE.
Best Regards,
Slim Pickens |DM Consultant
PH. No: +1 805-900-0860
Skype: digital.marketinghm
------------------------------ ------------------------------
-----------------------
1: This is a onetime email and you may ask us to "UNSUBSCRIBE".
2: If you are interested we will send more details on our "corporate
identity", "company profile", "why you should choose us?", "Price list",
"money back" etc. in our next mail.
P.S: - This is our marketing strategy that we use the Gmail account. Once
you reply us back, the next communication will be done from our corporate
email ID.
|
|
From: Berkeley C. <ber...@gm...> - 2014-05-10 08:53:27
|
Dear Csaba,
Nope, we don't really work on this anymore; 2010 was the last
update! Although that should be a doable change in the lexer and you're
welcome to make a contribution.
Best,
Berkeley
On 05/10/2014 01:37 AM, Csaba Hős wrote:
> Dear Developers,
>
> I love your package, it helps an awful lot in creating exam problems for
> my students. I see that the last update of the webpage was in 2010. Is
> the package still 'alive'? For example, it would be great to have other
> than one-letter variables...
>
> Regards,
> Csaba Hos
>
|
|
From: Csaba H. <csa...@gm...> - 2014-05-10 08:38:09
|
Dear Developers, I love your package, it helps an awful lot in creating exam problems for my students. I see that the last update of the webpage was in 2010. Is the package still 'alive'? For example, it would be great to have other than one-letter variables... Regards, Csaba Hos -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Csaba Janos HOS, PhD Egyetemi docens / Associate Professor Budapesti Műszaki és Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem / Budapest University of Technology and Economics Hidrodinamikai Rendszerek Tanszék / Department of Hydrodynamic Systems Cím / Address: 1111 Budapest, Stoczek utca 2-4 Web: www.hds.bme.hu E-mail: csa...@hd... Tel.: (36 1) 463-2216, (36 1) 463-1680 Fax.: (36 1) 463-3091 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
From: Berkeley R. C. <ber...@gm...> - 2014-02-05 21:20:54
|
Hi Ryan,
Most open source software packages aren't programs that you just run
on your computer. To make LaTeXCalc work you need to compile the source
code into a program from a command line.
On Mac OS X you can get to a terminal window from
Applications->Utilities->Terminal. We don't recommend trying this on
Windows if this process is new to you.
Here are some links to tutorials that may help. They should apply
to either Linux or Mac. You might need to do some other reading to
understand them fully.
http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Teaching/Unix/unix7.html
(you may also want to consult the previous tutorials to get up to speed)
http://www.codecoffee.com/tipsforlinux/articles/27.html
http://tldp.org/LDP/LG/current/smith.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compiler may be dense at first but it may
help explain what's going on.
You may be able to use LaTeXCalc with your website, but it will
probably be a struggle because we've designed it for running locally.
Best,
Berkeley
On 02/05/2014 12:24 AM, rya...@gm... wrote:
> How on earth does this work? I don't know what you mean by this. I was
> also wondering how to use this in ShareLaTeX.com
> To install, simply run './configure', 'make', 'make test', 'make install'.
> This would make my physics homework much more pleasant. Thanks.
>
> Yours truly,
> Ryan Dikdan
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
> Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
> Read the Whitepaper.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Latexcalc-bugs mailing list
> Lat...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/latexcalc-bugs
|
|
From: <rya...@gm...> - 2014-02-05 08:26:41
|
How on earth does this work? I don’t know what you mean by this. I was also wondering how to use this in ShareLaTeX.com To install, simply run './configure', 'make', 'make test', 'make install'. This would make my physics homework much more pleasant. Thanks. Yours truly, Ryan Dikdan |
|
From: Berkeley C. <ber...@gm...> - 2013-11-09 11:16:47
|
Hi Malte,
Would you send us a sample file that demonstrates the bug and also
what output you were expecting?
Berkeley
On 11/09/2013 02:39 AM, Malte Ritter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> tank you for creating this very helpful plugin.
>
> When I try to give out Tables with merged cells( In my specific case 4) the converter aways gives out multirow{1} instead of the number of volumes I actually wanted.
>
> Regards Malte
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers
> Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore
> techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most
> from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Latexcalc-bugs mailing list
> Lat...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/latexcalc-bugs
|
|
From: Malte R. <mal...@st...> - 2013-11-09 11:12:26
|
Hi,
tank you for creating this very helpful plugin.
When I try to give out Tables with merged cells( In my specific case 4) the converter aways gives out multirow{1} instead of the number of volumes I actually wanted.
Regards Malte
|
|
From: Steven B. <ste...@um...> - 2011-11-17 21:20:26
|
Hello Wojciech, I claim responsibility for your problem. When copying the man file I assumed you would have the man1 directory (bad me, I know). I added the bug to the tracker and will fix it as soon as I can. On an unrelated note, if you could give me some feedback on the package, that would be greatly appreciated. How easy is it to use and understand, are there any features you would like to see, things like that. We rarely hear from users, so most of the development stems from what Berkeley and I want. Thank you, Steven On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Berkeley Churchill <ber...@at...> wrote: > Hi Wojtek, > > Thank you for your e-mail. As you may have noticed we have not done > much development on this project in a while. There's probably a problem > somewhere in our autoconf setup. Next time we package a new release we'll > look into this. I hope everything else is working well! > > Berkeley > > > On 11/16/2011 05:13 AM, Wojciech Krzystek wrote: > > Hello, > during the installation of Your superb package I have occured a tiny litte > bug: > It could not create man page directory ( /usr/local/man/man1) > and copy latexcalc.1 there > so man page was not available (program itself had been installed ofcourse) > here's sample output from incomplete installation: > wojtek@mustang:~/Pulpit/latexcalc-1.0.1$ sudo make install > cd ./src; make > make[1]: Wejście do katalogu `/home/wojtek/Pulpit/latexcalc-1.0.1/src' > make[1]: `../build/latexcalc' jest aktualne. > make[1]: Opuszczenie katalogu `/home/wojtek/Pulpit/latexcalc-1.0.1/src' > /usr/bin/install -c ./build/latexcalc /usr/local/bin/latexcalc > /usr/bin/install -c ./doc/man/latexcalc.1 /usr/local/man/man1/latexcalc.1 > /usr/bin/install: nie można utworzyć zwykłego pliku > `/usr/local/man/man1/latexcalc.1': Nie ma takiego pliku ani katalogu > make: *** [install] Błąd 1 > It's in Polish, but last lines say: > /usr/bin/install: could not create regular file > `/usr/local/man/man1/latexcalc.1': No such file or directory > make: *** [install] Error 1 > So I manually created required directory (/usr/local/man/ was already there, > but without /man1 inside, so: #mkdir /usr/local/man/man1/ ) > Did over the installation process and output seemed more friendly: > wojtek@mustang:~/Pulpit/latexcalc-1.0.1$ sudo make install > cd ./src; make > make[1]: Wejście do katalogu `/home/wojtek/Pulpit/latexcalc-1.0.1/src' > make[1]: `../build/latexcalc' jest aktualne. > make[1]: Opuszczenie katalogu `/home/wojtek/Pulpit/latexcalc-1.0.1/src' > /usr/bin/install -c ./build/latexcalc /usr/local/bin/latexcalc > /usr/bin/install -c ./doc/man/latexcalc.1 /usr/local/man/man1/latexcalc.1 > After that man page was available > My distro is Ubuntu 10.10 32 bit, I had installed both bison and flex before > installing so it wasn't the problem. > Maybe it was totally my fault, but I think that simple piece of code > assuring that mentioned directory exist and creating > it if not could be included in further versions of the package. > Regards, > Wojtek > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d > > _______________________________________________ > Latexcalc-bugs mailing list > Lat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/latexcalc-bugs > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d > _______________________________________________ > Latexcalc-bugs mailing list > Lat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/latexcalc-bugs > > |
|
From: Berkeley C. <ber...@at...> - 2011-11-17 08:58:11
|
Hi Wojtek,
Thank you for your e-mail. As you may have noticed we have not
done much development on this project in a while. There's probably a
problem somewhere in our autoconf setup. Next time we package a new
release we'll look into this. I hope everything else is working well!
Berkeley
On 11/16/2011 05:13 AM, Wojciech Krzystek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> during the installation of Your superb package I have occured a tiny
> litte bug:
>
> It could not create man page directory ( /usr/local/man/man1)
> and copy latexcalc.1 there
> so man page was not available (program itself had been installed ofcourse)
> here's sample output from incomplete installation:
>
> wojtek@mustang:~/Pulpit/latexcalc-1.0.1$ sudo make install
> cd ./src; make
> make[1]: Wejście do katalogu `/home/wojtek/Pulpit/latexcalc-1.0.1/src'
> make[1]: `../build/latexcalc' jest aktualne.
> make[1]: Opuszczenie katalogu `/home/wojtek/Pulpit/latexcalc-1.0.1/src'
> /usr/bin/install -c ./build/latexcalc /usr/local/bin/latexcalc
> /usr/bin/install -c ./doc/man/latexcalc.1 /usr/local/man/man1/latexcalc.1
> /usr/bin/install: nie można utworzyć zwykłego pliku
> `/usr/local/man/man1/latexcalc.1': Nie ma takiego pliku ani katalogu
> make: *** [install] Błąd 1
>
> It's in Polish, but last lines say:
>
> /usr/bin/install: could not create regular file
> `/usr/local/man/man1/latexcalc.1': No such file or directory
> make: *** [install] Error 1
>
> So I manually created required directory (/usr/local/man/ was already
> there, but without /man1 inside, so: #mkdir/usr/local/man/man1/ )
>
> Did over the installation process and output seemed more friendly:
>
> wojtek@mustang:~/Pulpit/latexcalc-1.0.1$ sudo make install
> cd ./src; make
> make[1]: Wejście do katalogu `/home/wojtek/Pulpit/latexcalc-1.0.1/src'
> make[1]: `../build/latexcalc' jest aktualne.
> make[1]: Opuszczenie katalogu `/home/wojtek/Pulpit/latexcalc-1.0.1/src'
> /usr/bin/install -c ./build/latexcalc /usr/local/bin/latexcalc
> /usr/bin/install -c ./doc/man/latexcalc.1 /usr/local/man/man1/latexcalc.1
>
> After that man page was available
>
> My distro is Ubuntu 10.10 32 bit, I had installed both bison and flex
> before installing so it wasn't the problem.
> Maybe it was totally my fault, but I think that simple piece of code
> assuring that mentioned directory exist and creating
> it if not could be included in further versions of the package.
>
> Regards,
> Wojtek
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
> contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
> security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
> data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Latexcalc-bugs mailing list
> Lat...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/latexcalc-bugs
|
|
From: Wojciech K. <woj...@gm...> - 2011-11-16 13:13:45
|
Hello, during the installation of Your superb package I have occured a tiny litte bug: It could not create man page directory ( /usr/local/man/man1) and copy latexcalc.1 there so man page was not available (program itself had been installed ofcourse) here's sample output from incomplete installation: wojtek@mustang:~/Pulpit/latexcalc-1.0.1$ sudo make install cd ./src; make make[1]: Wejście do katalogu `/home/wojtek/Pulpit/latexcalc-1.0.1/src' make[1]: `../build/latexcalc' jest aktualne. make[1]: Opuszczenie katalogu `/home/wojtek/Pulpit/latexcalc-1.0.1/src' /usr/bin/install -c ./build/latexcalc /usr/local/bin/latexcalc /usr/bin/install -c ./doc/man/latexcalc.1 /usr/local/man/man1/latexcalc.1 /usr/bin/install: nie można utworzyć zwykłego pliku `/usr/local/man/man1/latexcalc.1': Nie ma takiego pliku ani katalogu make: *** [install] Błąd 1 It's in Polish, but last lines say: /usr/bin/install: could not create regular file `/usr/local/man/man1/latexcalc.1': No such file or directory make: *** [install] Error 1 So I manually created required directory (/usr/local/man/ was already there, but without /man1 inside, so: #mkdir /usr/local/man/man1/ ) Did over the installation process and output seemed more friendly: wojtek@mustang:~/Pulpit/latexcalc-1.0.1$ sudo make install cd ./src; make make[1]: Wejście do katalogu `/home/wojtek/Pulpit/latexcalc-1.0.1/src' make[1]: `../build/latexcalc' jest aktualne. make[1]: Opuszczenie katalogu `/home/wojtek/Pulpit/latexcalc-1.0.1/src' /usr/bin/install -c ./build/latexcalc /usr/local/bin/latexcalc /usr/bin/install -c ./doc/man/latexcalc.1 /usr/local/man/man1/latexcalc.1 After that man page was available My distro is Ubuntu 10.10 32 bit, I had installed both bison and flex before installing so it wasn't the problem. Maybe it was totally my fault, but I think that simple piece of code assuring that mentioned directory exist and creating it if not could be included in further versions of the package. Regards, Wojtek |
|
From: Berkeley C. <ber...@at...> - 2011-07-30 17:28:40
|
Nope. Java is too different a technology from what we are using and it would be far too much work to port it. Berkeley On 07/02/2011 04:11 AM, constantine s. wrote: > Greets, > > Any chance for your project to get released in form of java package ? > > peace > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. > Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. > Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey > > > _______________________________________________ > Latexcalc-bugs mailing list > Lat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/latexcalc-bugs |
|
From: constantine s. <sp...@gm...> - 2011-07-02 11:11:25
|
Greets, Any chance for your project to get released in form of java package ? peace |
2 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
