Re: [Laptoplinux-devel] another config

[Nathan O. <nat...@gm...>]

I hadn't even realized Autopackage 1.0 had been released! I'll have to
check that out!

I think I've tried minislack. It's a 3rd party effort, no? ZipSlack
might also be interesting. Really, we *could* just take a Slackware
install, par down the packages a long ways, and rebuild from the
ground up (using the default Slackware packages). Then, we'd end up
with exactly what we want; no more, no less.

Well, except that it'd be awesome if BeOS supported Averatec hardware
a bit better. Then Slackware would be providing a bit more than I'd
want :-).


On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 21:05:22 -0600, Jaxon Lee <ak...@my...> wrote:
> Nathan had some valid points about my kernel config, so I retooled it
> based on a standard Slackware config.  It is now only "optimized" for
> the Averatec.  All other options (except for old CD-Rom support and
> ISDN) are intact.  Anyone care to give it a try?
> 
> In other news, has anyone heard of MiniSlack?  Slackware on 1 CD with
> some pared down choices.  I'm going to try grafting our packages onto
> it, and tweaking their install routine so maybe we can end up with an
> ISO out of this whole deal.  I'll keep everyone updated on my progress.
> It feels very promising though.
> 
> Has anyone fooled around with the new autopackage 1.0 release?  Just
> curious as it seems like and interesting project.
> 
> --Jaxon
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Laptoplinux-devel mailing list
> Lap...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/laptoplinux-devel
> 


-- 
-NKO-