Re: [Lapackpp-devel] So what is the advantage of lapackpp over lapack?

[Christian S. <sti...@tu...>]

Am Sonntag, 4. Februar 2007 15:06 schrieb sun:
> I know that LAPACK has both C and Fortran versions.
> What is the advatage of lapackpp then?

LAPACK =3D=3D C, Fortran
Lapackpp =3D=3D C++

That's the answer.

Christian

> Is it object orient and easy to use?
>
> On 2/4/07, Christian Stimming <sti...@tu...> wrote:
> > Dear Mr. Ozturk,
> >
> > no, lapackpp does not offer any iterative or sparse solvers.
> >
> > If you need such kind of solvers, I would suggest you should take a look
> > at
> > the original LAPACK solvers (available in Fortran). Lapackpp should only
> > provide a C++ wrapper to the more familiar parts of LAPACK, but your
> > specialized request should rather be solved by using the LAPACK functio=
ns
> > directly.
> >
> > Christian
> >
> > Am Sonntag, 4. Februar 2007 12:29 schrieb oz...@ee...:
> > > Dear Mr Christian Stimming,
> > >
> > > I am pursueing MSc. at Bilkent university in Turkey. In my thesis, I =
am
> > > solving large sparse linear equations(beyond 10000*10000). Currently I
> >
> > am
> >
> > > making use of lapackpp in .net2003. However as far as I know, all
> > > matrix structures and methods for solving equations are defined for
> > > dense
> >
> > matrices
> >
> > > which limits the size of the problem that I am able solve. Is there a=
ny
> > > patch or an addition to lapackpp for iterative and/or direct  sparse
> >
> > matrix
> >
> > > solvers? I would appreciate any help coming from you since such an
> >
> > ability
> >
> > > in solving sparse matrices enables me to write my paper and complete =
my
> > > thesis as soon as possible. My thesis is analyzing QoS in OBS networks
> > > using a novel numerical method.
> > >
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > >
> > > Onur =C3=96zt=C3=BCrk
> > > EEE @ Bilkent University
> > > Ankara, Turkey