Re: [Lapackpp-devel] Operator+=

[Christian S. <sti...@tu...>]

Ok, thank you very much.

Jacob (Jack) Gryn schrieb:
> Done, and committed to CVS.
> 
> I tested the gmd one, I'm assuming the others will work, the only difference
> is the complex one where it did .r and .i separately (but in the same loop).

I agree, the complex case should be fine as well.

By the way, did you think about the work size variable of your 
LaLUInverseIP code? 
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=11404933

Christian

> 
> Jack
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: lap...@li... [mailto:lapackpp-devel-
>>ad...@li...] On Behalf Of Christian Stimming
>>Sent: April 18, 2005 4:03 PM
>>To: Jacob (Jack) Gryn; lap...@li...
>>Subject: Re: [Lapackpp-devel] Operator+=
>>
>>Am Montag, 18. April 2005 19:45 schrieb Jacob (Jack) Gryn:
>>
>>>Just FYI, I was referring to operator+=(double)  or operator+=(complex),
>>>etc.  (not matrix addition which you can do with Blas_Add_Mult).
>>
>>These are fine and you can add them as you wish. They are quite clear
>>about
>>what will happen and which matrices/vectors get modified. (I'm actually
>>wondering why I never needed those... whatever. Simply add them.)
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Christian