RE: [Lapackpp-devel] Operator+=

[Jacob \(Jack\) G. <jg...@cs...>]

Done, and committed to CVS.

I tested the gmd one, I'm assuming the others will work, the only difference
is the complex one where it did .r and .i separately (but in the same loop).

Jack

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lap...@li... [mailto:lapackpp-devel-
> ad...@li...] On Behalf Of Christian Stimming
> Sent: April 18, 2005 4:03 PM
> To: Jacob (Jack) Gryn; lap...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Lapackpp-devel] Operator+=
> 
> Am Montag, 18. April 2005 19:45 schrieb Jacob (Jack) Gryn:
> > Just FYI, I was referring to operator+=(double)  or operator+=(complex),
> > etc.  (not matrix addition which you can do with Blas_Add_Mult).
> 
> These are fine and you can add them as you wish. They are quite clear
> about
> what will happen and which matrices/vectors get modified. (I'm actually
> wondering why I never needed those... whatever. Simply add them.)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christian
> 
> >
> >
> >
> > Jack
> >
> >
> >
> >   _____
> >
> > From: lap...@li...
> > [mailto:lap...@li...] On Behalf Of Jacob
> > (Jack) Gryn
> > Sent: April 18, 2005 1:43 PM
> > To: lap...@li...
> > Subject: [Lapackpp-devel] Operator+=
> >
> >
> >
> > I don't remember if I brought this up before, but is there any problem
> > adding "operator+=" to the matrix/vector classes?
> >
> >
> >
> > They should not use any extra memory, as all the processing is done
> within
> > the existing matrices/vectors.
> >
> >
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> >
> >
> > Jack
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> lapackpp-devel mailing list
> lap...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lapackpp-devel