> For any -lFOO in the gcc-command, the gcc will look for libFOO.so (if I
> understood gcc correctly). In your case it is probably not correct to
> have
> -llapack.2.0 anyway -- it should probably rather simply be -llapack.
>
> First potential Workaround: After ./configure in lapackpp, edit the file
> src/Makefile, look for the string "-llapack.2.0" and replace it by
> "-llapack".
>
> Second potential Workaround: In /usr/lib, make a symlink with the name
> "lapack.so" to the existing "lapack.so.2.0".
>
Ok. I tried the first workaround before posting the mail and it doesn't work. The second workaround worked well - I just had to do a couple of symlinks: liblapack.so.2.0 libcblas.so.3.0 libf77blas.so.3.0 libatlas.so.3.0 to their versions with just ".so". I started ./configure again and this time it compiled with no problems.
Thanks a lot,
Mateusz
----------------------------------------------------
U nas oferty wyjazdów i wycieczek z Gwarancją Najniższej Ceny!
Masz pewność, że kupujesz najtaniej!
http://klik.wp.pl/?adr=http%3A%2F%2Fturystyka.wp.pl%2Fwycieczki.html&sid=732
|
