I have tested them all except for the LUInverse with the external work
variable. If you like, I'll test that one too.
Jack
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Stimming [mailto:sti...@tu...]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 6:04 AM
> To: Jacob (Jack) Gryn
> Cc: lap...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Lapackpp-devel] Updates
>
> Dear Jack,
>
> yes, I've seen your code. It looks quite good and I didn't have any
> further questions (otherwise I'd have replied earlier). Have you
> verified the new functions that they really do what they are supposed
> to? If yes, then it's good. If you want to, I could make a 2.2.1 release
> with your functions added, but otherwise I'd wait until May for the next
> release.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christian
>
> Jacob (Jack) Gryn schrieb:
>
> > Incase you haven't noticed, I've updated the CVS with the following
> > additions:
> >
> >
> >
> > - Addition of LUInverse and Addition of LaEigSolve for
> > general-purpose matrices.
> >
> >
> >
> > There are two versions of the Inverse; one of which, you can re-use the
> > 'work' variable.
> >
> >
> >
> > There are two versions of the LaEigSolve; the input is a square
> > LaGenMatDouble - since the output may have complex eigenvalues, one
> > version has output with an LaVectorComplex eigenvalue set, and the other
> > version has two LaVectorDouble eigenvalue sets (one real and one
> > imaginary; in case you only need one or wish to deal with real and
> > imaginary data separately, it won't allocate more memory). Both
> > versions give a LaGenMatDouble matrix for the set of eigenvectors.
> >
> >
> >
> > Jack
> >
|