Hi,
I'm sorry, but I don't work with lapackpp anymore. If you have questions
concerning this project, please ask on the mailing list lapackpp-
de...@li... (subscription required).
As for code suggestions: Thanks for the proposed include, I've added those to
SVN.
If you are interested in working on the code further, I would gladly add you
as a developer on sourceforge so that you have direct SVN write access.
As for the H_Dot_Prod: There could very well be errors on the x86_64 platform
for the definitions either of LACOMPLEX *or* in the declaration of lapack's
implementation function of the dot product: On some platforms, it returned the
result by-value, whereas on other platforms, it returned the result in one of
the input arguments, and currently ./configure should check for this during
configure. This might be wrong on platforms which didn't exist years ago when
those tests were written, so there might be errors here.
Regards,
Christian
Am Sonntag, 14. März 2010 schrieben Sie:
> Hello,
>
> My name is Nadav I am a PhD student in Tel Aviv University (E.E
> department). I have successfully installed (using make) lapackpp 2.5.2
> and 2.5.3 on my open suse 11.2 Linux system (see uname below).
>
> However, using make check revealed two bugs. One was easily solved by
> inserting
>
> #include<fstream> inside the following file:
>
> blaspp/testing/tblasd++.cc
>
> The second problem was inside the file:
>
> blaspp/testing/check_blas1pp.cc .
>
> It failed in line 29 where the routine "Blas_H_Dot_Prod" was unsuccessfully
> checked.
>
> It looks like something is wronge with the LACOMPLEX definitions.
>
> I would very much appreciate any kind of help from you.
>
> Thanks, Nadav
>
>
> Linux 2.6.31.12-0.1-default #1 SMP 2010-01-27 08:20:11 +0100 x86_64 x86_64
> x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
>
> --
>
> Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
>
|
