Re: [Lame-dev] 3.94 crash

[Takehiro T. <tak...@in...>]

>>>>> "G" == Gabriel Bouvigne <bou...@mp...> writes:

    >> > Mistake: you should use "--athlower -22" and not "--athlower
    >> 22"
    >> 
    >> It shouldn't segfault in such a case...

    G> What I mean is that I made a mistake in my mail, so the proper
    G> line to crash lame is :

    G> "--vbr-old --athlower -22 --resample 22050 t1.wav" With t1.wav
    G> beeing from our test cases (the low volume Dire Strait sample)

yes, it does not seg-faults.
it simply abort with assertion failure :(

lame: bitstream.c:182: drain_into_ancillary: Assertion `remainingBits >= 0' failed.

Anyway, I can reproduce the problem and I will debug it...
-- 
Takehiro TOMINAGA // may the source be with you!