From: Takehiro T. <tak...@in...> - 2002-10-14 17:52:18
|
I just made a new branch, "takehiro-stable_2002_10_15", forked from my experimental branch. I think current status of this branch is pretty stable and has better quality than the mainline (at least for me), and all the patches in the mainline branch are applied. Once I said "my branch is not ready for merging", on HA. But with all the holidays in this weekend (in Japan, there are three consecutive holidays:p), I cleaned up and checked my branch, to make it more stable, rather than adding new functionality. And my work result in this branch. >>>>> "G" == Gabriel Bouvigne <bou...@mp...> writes: G> However, Takehiro's branch is hanlding fast presets a little G> better than the main branch. So this would be extra work to fix G> fast presets in the main branch, and this would be a "waste" if G> we merge Takehiro's branch just after. Yes, I agree. G> So my suggestions is: G> *merge Takehiro's branch now G> *focus on fixing current presets G> *focus on a release aroun nov, 15th I am so lazy to read the whole of discussion on HA, but I propose replace main branch with this branch. Yes, "REPLACE" it. I wonder how many people attempt to join the merge process. Once I mailed the 4 psymodel patches, one of which contained bug. No one noticed it, and I desperated the LAME-dev. Moreover, the way to "MERGE" is too heavy task, making many patches from big diff is not easy and tend to make a bug. So the "MERGE" is only wasting time. I prefer "REPLACE". Any comments ? -- Takehiro TOMINAGA // may the source be with you! |