From: Mark T. <mt...@wi...> - 2001-10-29 22:02:54
|
What is the right way to determine if a VBR tag is the old Xing tag, or the new info tag? The presence of "LAME" in the bytes after the toc? Mark |
From: Roel V. <vd...@yu...> - 2001-10-29 22:21:25
|
Hello Mark, Monday, October 29, 2001, 11:02:56 PM, you wrote: MT> What is the right way to determine if a VBR tag is the MT> old Xing tag, or the new info tag? The presence of "LAME" MT> in the bytes after the toc? MT> Mark I think the safest way is if the TagCRC checks out: http://users.belgacom.net/gc247244/extra/tag.html#tagcrc btw: the spec is still inaccurate, as I saw the number of bytes until this point might differ for lower samplerates and non-MPEG1. (but Jonathan implemented it fine) -- Best regards, Roel mailto:vd...@yu... |
From: Alexander L. <Alexander@Leidinger.net> - 2001-10-30 10:44:46
|
On 29 Okt, Roel VdB wrote: > btw: the spec is still inaccurate, as I saw the number of bytes until this > point might differ for lower samplerates and non-MPEG1. (but Jonathan > implemented it fine) Do you have a decission about which kind of fix for the bus errror on Sparc hardware we should apply? Bye, Alexander. -- If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed... ...Oh, wait a minute, he already does. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 |