Menu

Official release of 4.2.2?

Fln
2017-10-13
2017-10-14
  • Fln

    Fln - 2017-10-13

    Hi all,

    From what I understand the most recent supported version in LabVIEW is 3.4.2.
    Do you know of any issues that would prevent REQ-REP communication with non-LabVIEW application running with 4.4.2?

    I also saw in this thread https://sourceforge.net/p/labview-zmq/discussion/general/thread/97e9e036/ that you attached dlls that seems to be 4.2.2. Are they reliable and officially released or how should I treat them?

    Thanks in advance.
    Best Regards.

     
  • Martijn Jasperse

    Hi,
    There should be no issue interfacing ZMQv3 with ZMQv4 in all supported v3 protocols. The protocol itself negotiates to talk in a backwards-compatible way, the main difference being the added security mechanisms in v4 that are disabled when communicating with v3. REQ-REP is a very basic protocol and should work totally fine - I myself use LVZMQ with v3.2.4 to talk to pyzmq with v4.1.6 using REQ-REP.

    That said, I was considering moving across to 4.2.2, seeing as how it is the current stable release of libzmq and I hadn't updated that in a while. I made a post https://sourceforge.net/p/labview-zmq/discussion/general/thread/448c4210/ that gained zero interest so I shelved it, but it could still happen if there is interest.

    Cheers,
    Martijn

     
  • Fln

    Fln - 2017-10-14

    Hi,

    Thanks for your reply. What about the dlls attached in thread https://sourceforge.net/p/labview-zmq/discussion/general/thread/97e9e036/ ? Are they reliable and safe to use?

    Kind Regards.

     
  • Martijn Jasperse

    That particular build is completely untested, so be cautious using it. I recommend only using full releases in production code. They are PROBABLY fine because it's an official libzmq release, but I can't sayforsure

     
  • Fln

    Fln - 2017-10-15

    Thanks for clarification.

     

Log in to post a comment.