Hi,

 

The routing is being performed by a redback se400 which does not impose such a limitation.

 

 

Regards,

Netops2010

 

 

 

 


From: dparrish@google.com [mailto:dparrish@google.com] On Behalf Of David Parrish
Sent: Wednesday, 20 January 2010 1:08 PM
To: Jason Millan
Cc: l2tpns-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [l2tpns-users] l2tpns clustering max number of nodes

 

I haven't touched l2tpns in years so my memory may be off, but I think the limit you are coming up against here is the iBGP route limit on your upstream router. I *think* the limit is 8 on Cisco gear, but I could be very wrong.

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Jason Millan <jmillan@m2.com.au> wrote:

Hi,

 

We have a 6 node cluster, for some reason when all six nodes are active, one node handles no traffic and has no load.

 

As soon as another node is stopped the last one in the cluster starts to participate i.e. traffic on interfaces and load on the actual box.

 

Are there any limits on the number of nodes that can actively participate in the cluster or any ideas?

 

 

Regards,

Netops2010

 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the
world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference
attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through
interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
L2tpns-users mailing list
L2tpns-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/l2tpns-users