From: Pekka E. <pe...@cs...> - 2008-05-08 05:30:16
|
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Pekka Enberg <pe...@cs...> wrote: > You might want to read carefully what Linus wrote: > > > The one that already has a 4 byte padding thing on x86-64 just after the > > spinlock? And that on 32-bit x86 (with less than 256 CPU's) would have two > > bytes of padding if we didn't just make the spinlock type unconditionally > > 32 bits rather than the 16 bits we actually _use_? > > So you need to add the flag _after_ ->lock and _before_ ->head.... Oh should have taken my morning coffee first, before ->lock works obviously as well. |