From: Pekka E. <pe...@cs...> - 2008-05-08 05:27:44
|
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Andrea Arcangeli <an...@qu...> wrote: > Actually I looked both at the struct and at the slab alignment just in > case it was changed recently. Now after reading your mail I also > compiled it just in case. > > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ struct anon_vma { > struct anon_vma { > > spinlock_t lock; /* Serialize access to vma list */ > > struct list_head head; /* List of private "related" vmas */ > + int flag:1; > }; You might want to read carefully what Linus wrote: > The one that already has a 4 byte padding thing on x86-64 just after the > spinlock? And that on 32-bit x86 (with less than 256 CPU's) would have two > bytes of padding if we didn't just make the spinlock type unconditionally > 32 bits rather than the 16 bits we actually _use_? So you need to add the flag _after_ ->lock and _before_ ->head.... Pekka |