From: Linus T. <tor...@li...> - 2008-05-07 23:40:02
|
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > At least for mmu-notifier-core given I obviously am the original > author of that code, I hope the From: of the email was enough even if > an additional From: andrea was missing in the body. Ok, this whole series of patches have just been such a disaster that I'm (a) disgusted that _anybody_ sent an Acked-by: for any of it, and (b) that I'm still looking at it at all, but I am. And quite frankly, the more I look, and the more answers from you I get, the less I like it. And I didn't like it that much to start with, as you may have noticed. You say that "At least for mmu-notifier-core given I obviously am the original author of that code", but that is not at all obvious either. One of the reasons I stated that authorship seems to have been thrown away is very much exactly in that first mmu-notifier-core patch: + * linux/mm/mmu_notifier.c + * + * Copyright (C) 2008 Qumranet, Inc. + * Copyright (C) 2008 SGI + * Christoph Lameter <cla...@sg...> so I would very strongly dispute that it's "obvious" that you are the original author of the code there. So there was a reason why I said that I thought authorship had been lost somewhere along the way. Linus |