From: Linus T. <tor...@li...> - 2008-05-07 23:04:14
|
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > Ok so I see the problem Linus is referring to now (I received the hint > by PM too), I thought the order of the signed-off-by was relevant, it > clearly isn't or we're wasting space ;) The order of the signed-offs are somewhat relevant, but no, sign-offs don't mean authorship. See the rules for sign-off: you can sign off on another persons patches, even if they didn't sign off on them themselves. That's clause (b) in particular. So yes, quite often you'd _expect_ the first sign-off to match the author, but that's a correlation, not a causal relationship. Linus |