From: Avi K. <av...@qu...> - 2008-05-07 07:56:34
|
Karl Rister wrote: > On Thursday 01 May 2008 7:16:53 pm Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > >> Does -no-kvm-irqchip or -no-kvm-pit makes a difference? If not, please >> grab kvm_stat --once output when that happens. >> > > Per some suggestions I have moved up to kvm-68 which is better, but still > having problems. Replicating the problem with only one guest spinning has > proven quite difficult, but attempting to boot a large smp guest can reliably > recreate the problem. Using -no-kvm-pit did not help the large guest > and -no-kvm-irqchip made it seize up even earlier with only 1 cpu spinning > instead of all of them. > > Can you try the many-uniprocessor-guests scenario, with each guest pinned to a cpu? taskset $(( 1 << (RANDOM % 32) )) qemu ... -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function |